This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Oliver Kellogg's Response to G++ 3.3 and ld Error
- From: "Tom Browder" <tom3 at fwb dot asi dot srs dot com>
- To: "'Oliver Kellogg'" <oliver dot kellogg at sysde dot eads dot net>
- Cc: <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 12:24:08 -0500
- Subject: RE: Oliver Kellogg's Response to G++ 3.3 and ld Error
Oliver, I'm the original one with the problem, and Dara's helping track it
down.
Can you or anyone please point me to the documentation on the versioning
thing about standard functions and glibc? I haven't found it in the libc,
gcc, nor ld info(except passing mention), but so many folks know about it
I'm sure I've missed something big somewhere (or I'm just old and can't see
very well--short attention span and all).
Many thanks.
Tom Browder
SRS Technologies, Inc.
838 N. Eglin Parkway, Suite 202
Fort Walton Beach, FL 32547
Tel: 850-862-4188
Fax: 850-862-8055
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On
Behalf Of Oliver Kellogg
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 9:52 AM
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: G++ 3.3 and ld Error
Hi Dara,
The libstdc++.so has an unresolved reference to
_Unwind_Resume_or_Rethrow@GCC_3.3
whereas the library libgcc_s.so defines the symbol
_Unwind_Resume_or_Rethrow
i.e. without the versioning extension.
Hope this helps,
Oliver
-- oliver dot kellogg at sysde dot eads dot net
On Sat, 17 May 2003 12:30:36 -0700, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
>
> it looks like some part of the unwind library is not being found in the
linking process. Can you add
> the "-v" option, rerun the command and post the output? Note that
somewhere, you need to be linking
> to libsupc++ .