This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 3.3: long long bug?
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: "A.R. Ashok Kumar" <ashokar at sankhya dot com>
- Cc: Anders Ådland <aaadland at atmel dot no>,Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>,Lev Assinovsky <LAssinovsky at algorithm dot aelita dot com>,gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 16:56:29 +0200
- Subject: Re: gcc 3.3: long long bug?
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0304071959571.361-100000@sun103>
"A.R. Ashok Kumar" <ashokar at sankhya dot com> writes:
|> Hi,
|>
|> On 7 Apr 2003, Anders [ISO-8859-1] Ådland wrote:
|>
|> > I don't know anything about C standards, but why do we have to add the
|> > 'LL' suffix? Is it giving any additional information to the compiler?
|>
|> If you didn't specify 'L' or 'LL' suffix, then gcc will consider it
|> as "integer" type (4 bytes).
This is wrong. The type of the constant will be the first to fit, using a
particular order.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab at suse dot de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."