This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Prefix command with gcc-2.95
- From: "Roger.Gough" <Roger dot Gough at ul dot ie>
- To: 'Rupert Wood' <me at rupey dot net>, "'Roger.Gough'" <roger dot gough at ul dot ie>
- Cc: "'Gcc Help (E-mail)'" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 09:24:34 +0000
- Subject: RE: Prefix command with gcc-2.95
Thanks Rup for your reply.
Yes everything you said I have done. However I was getting an error
with the Make command. If it does not build fully does that mean I will not
see any files in the directory I set as my prefix? I definetely dont see any
files in my prefix directory after I do my configuration. At the moment I am
not too bothered about the make error, I just want to get the prefix command
working. Thanks again.
Roger.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rupert Wood [mailto:me@rupey.net]
Sent: 04 February 2003 18:12
To: 'Roger.Gough'
Cc: 'Gcc Help (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: Prefix command with gcc-2.95
Roger Gough wrote:
> I am having some problems using the prefix command with gcc version
> 2.95. With the command:
>
> --prefix=dirname.
>
> This command should specify the toplevel installation directory.
> This does not seem to work for me.
It's always worked here. Can I verify you're adding this to the
configure line for a source-code distribution of GCC, i.e. you've done
something like
gzip -cd gcc-2.95.3.tar.gz |tar xvf -
mkdir build
cd build
../gcc-2.95.3/configure --prefix=/my/install/path
followed by 'make bootstrap', 'make install', etc.? It's not a parameter
for the gcc executable, nor is it a standalone command.
Rup.