This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
There was a list called tuxcprograming or something like that for C programming doubts.. I am mention this because I see there are at times some C programming doubts answered in this list which is supposed to be a gcc list.. Anyway I dont care, it doesnt bother me this kind of messages.. but maybe other do. > In your case, "string" is a pointer to char, so *string is a char, which matches > the first case above, so it is passed as int, so the format specifier "%d" works > just fine. If you use "%hu", printf() still reads an int, but converts it to > an unsigned short. Now either you didn't test this with negative char values, > or your char happens to be an unsigned type; otherwise, "%hu" wouldn't have > given the same output as "%d". > > Btw, if you wanted to print it as a char value, instead of a short value, you > should have used "%hhd" or "%hhu". > > Hope this clarifies things for you, > > > Segher > > > -- gnupg public key at: wwwkeys.pgp.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje esta firmada digitalmente
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |