This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:50:30PM -0600, Keen Wayne A Contr AFRL/MNGG wrote: > Thanks. [...] > If you open the individual categories you will find things > that are labeled "skip". There have even been some packages in the last few > weeks > that after installing, you have to reinstall to get everything working. Yes. Here's what I did: I went to cygwin.sourceforge.net, clicked over to where the Setup.exe is located, ran it, then selected everything of value (gcc-2.95, all libraries, etc). > I noticed there are a couple of important things you left out. Number 1, do > you > install Cygwin with a DOS or a Unix option? Next, what additions, if any, > have > you made to your environment variables, and where did you make them. It is > [...] I did not do anything special with respect to a "Unix" or "DOS" option. I don't really even know what you are talking about there. The defaults just worked. There were no additions to my system environment variables. Once I had installed Cygwin, I double-click on the Cygwin link on my desktop which starts up bash. From within that shell, everything is set up correctly. I added /usr/local/bin to my $PATH using ~/.bashrc, to find the other packages I installed (from source). > One other question is this. Do you use 3.0.3 daily on regular work? Yes. I run all my code through gcc-3.0.3 to check for standards conformance. However, I use gcc-2.95 for my final code because my gcc-3.0.3 binaries are much larger than the same binary compiled by gcc-2.95. I have compiled the gcc-3.0.3 libraries without debugging and with "-O2", so it's not debugging information in the libraries. Does anyone know what I need to do to resolve the binary size problem? > (a) You have no additional tools installed or modified above base Cygwin > tools Nothing that would affect this. For example, I have XFree86-4.1.0 and tons of X utilities installed. > (b) You don't do anything after make -k install, i.e. move things around, > compile something additional in. That is correct. Best regards, ---Kayvan [[ Available for consulting. http://www.sylvan.com/~kayvan/Resume.html ]] Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89) http://sylvan.com/~kayvan | "crown of her husband" | Robin Gregory (2/28/92)
Attachment:
msg00312/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |