This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Installation using relative (instead of hard-coded) paths
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Installation using relative (instead of hard-coded) paths
- From: Srinivas Mantripragada <smprag at yahoo dot com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Thanx for the response. Will the regular
"prefix=../.."
mechanism then take care of this on GCC 3.0? Has
GCC 3.0 been officially released, I don;t see it in
the GNU free software directory, although I do see
"guidelines for GCC 3.0 branch"..
Thanx,
-Srini
--- Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> On May 22, 2001, Srinivas Mantripragada
> <smprag@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > This makes it hard as a general mechanism, since
> > these fully expanded paths are not easily
> portable.
> > Is there any way for GCC, when it's building the
> > various components, to use relative paths
> instead,..?
>
> GCC 3.0 will do this. For 2.95.2, you're out of
> luck, unless you're
> willing to back-port whatever changes were made to
> that effect.
>
> --
> Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see
> http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
> Red Hat GCC Developer
> aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
> CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
> oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
> Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to
> mailing lists, not to me
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/