This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Building GCC under Cygwin. Please help.
- To: 'Alexandre Oliva' <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Vivin Suresh Paliath <computer_maniac at hotmail dot com>
- Subject: RE: Building GCC under Cygwin. Please help.
- From: David Korn <dkorn at pixelpower dot com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:33:05 +0100
- Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:aoliva@redhat.com]
>Sent: 30 March 2001 08:09
>> This is the third time I am sending this problem in. I didn't get a
>> response earlier. I would really appreciate any help!
>
>You might have better luck posting to some Cygwin-specific mailing
>list.
But nonetheless, problems building gcc on *any* platform aren't
offtopic here. It's just there's more cygwin experts on cygwin lists!
>> /srcdir/gcc-2.95.3/configure --prefix=/usr --with-gnu-as
>--with-gnu-ld --enable-threads=posix 2>&1 | tee configure.out
>
>Did you try without the --enable-threads=posix? I suspect that's the
>problem. Try just --enable-threads, so that GCC chooses the
>appropriate threading model, if any.
And isn't --prefix=/usr a bit of a risky idea? If your compiler turns
out to be broken, you'll have lost all the old gcc/g++ drivers for the
old version (the main compiler itself will be safe since it lives in a
subdirectory of /usr/lib/ that includes the version number), which may
make it slightly difficult to revert to the older version.
Also you need to add the flag --with-included-gettext and delete or
rename the texinfo directory in the source distribution to get the
.info files to build correctly.
DaveK
--
All your base are belong to us!
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************