This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Can't locate newly compiled 2.95.2 binaries!?
- To: Eric Gravel <wildgod at hotmail dot com>
- Subject: Re: Can't locate newly compiled 2.95.2 binaries!?
- From: <llewelly at 198 dot dsl dot xmission dot com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:12:35 -0700 (MST)
- cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Eric Gravel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to upgrade my c compiler, gcc version pgcc-2.91.66
> 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release), for the past day now and until this
> morning I had no success.
>
> Last time I tried compiling I was getting the following error:
> "xgcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11."
> I manage to overcome this problem by compiling a new version
> of make though I don't think this matter, binutils 2.9.1 and glibc
> 2.1.2 with the crypt & linuxthread add on.
gcc getting Fatal signal 11 is often (but not always) a sign of bad RAM or
other bad hardware. See http://www.BitWizard.nl/sig11/ .
>
> Now when I compiled gcc 2.95.2 I used the following commands
> ./configure --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr
It is advisable to build gcc in a directory separate from the sources:
$mkdir ../objdir
$cd ../objdir
$../gcc-2.95.2/configure [configure args]
More importantly, '--exec-prefix=/usr' sets the directory binary
executables will be placed in to '/usr' . That is, gcc, g++, g77, etc,
will all end up in /usr ... *not* /usr/bin . If you want them in
/usr/bin, '--prefix=/usr' alone is good enough; by defualt they will
end up in {prefix}/bin .
> make bootstrap
> make check
> make install
>
> Read the installation document, I should find my binaries in /usr/bin
> right?
No. --exec-prefix overrides the default behavior.
> Looking at the content matching the date (Jan 23 in the wee
> hours 3am) there's no gcc or anything that looks like a compiler
> executable. The only thing close is called c++filt. I doubt that is it.
>
>
>
> So, does anyone else have a suggestion as to where I should be looking
> or even better, what commands I should have used to compile and
> install gcc 2.95.2? Is there a log of what configure & make perform?
>
>
> Thanks for the help,
>
> Eric A. Gravel
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>