This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC for SHARC port to PC (numerical C)
- To: help-gcc at gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: GCC for SHARC port to PC (numerical C)
- From: Alan Lehotsky <lehotsky at tiac dot net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 13:35:28 -0500
- Newsgroups: comp.dsp,gnu.gcc.help
- Organization: Quality Software Management
- References: <852but$f42$1@newnews.mikom.csir.co.za> <38754F47.BDF3113D@well.com>
- Xref: wodc7nx0 comp.dsp:9548 gnu.gcc.help:2393
In article <38754F47.BDF3113D@well.com>, Kenneth Porter
<shiva@well.com> wrote:
>>>mj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> The gcc port by ADI for the sharc includes numerical extensions to the
>>>> C
>>>> language (vector, complex arithmetic). I am interested in developing
>>>> code
>>>> on a PC and port it to the SHARC at a later stage. I would like to
>>>> compile
>>>> numerical C codes with gcc on a PC without a SHARC. Does anybody have
>>>> experience with this? Must I recompile the compiler for the PC?
>>>> TYIA
>>>> Marthinus
>>>
>>>I think Gnu adopted the numeric extensions at one point, but I don't
>>>know if they're in the current generation of the compiler. There *is* a
>>>PC port of gcc. Check out Cygwin (http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin/)
>>>for example.
I'm pretty sure that:
1/ The ADI extensions never worked correctly. At least not if
you turned on the optimizer.
2/ They have long since been obsoleted in the GCC code
(there was some discussion about some code support for
iterators that wasn't totally dead, but nobody had a clue
about how it was supposed to work.)
-- Al
--
Quality Software Management
http://www.tiac.net/users/lehotsky
Process Improvement | Management Consulting | Compiler Implementation