This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Is *& Legal?
- To: help-gcc at gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: Is *& Legal?
- From: martin dot kahlert at keksy dot mchp dot siemens dot de (Martin Kahlert)
- Date: 10 Nov 1999 07:44:33 GMT
- Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
- Organization: Siemens Inc.
- References: <MPG.129004dc43a51770989688@news.wustl.edu>
- Reply-To: martin dot kahlert at mchp dot siemens dot de
- Xref: wodc7nx0 gnu.gcc.help:1756
In article <MPG.129004dc43a51770989688@news.wustl.edu>,
Erik Berry <eberry@please.remove.aol.com> writes:
> Some compilers allow function definitions like this in header files:
>
> int my_function(char *&next);
Isn't that a reference to a char pointer in C++?
Perhaps you missed some ifdef c++ stuff?
Bye,
Martin.
--
The early bird gets the worm. If you want something else for
breakfast, get up later.