[gcc r14-9407] LoongArch: Fixed an issue with the implementation of the template atomic_compare_and_swapsi.

LuluCheng chenglulu@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Mar 9 01:47:19 GMT 2024


https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a3fbec0a4d3f36de58df9ef0b3992a3ffb359c2

commit r14-9407-g3a3fbec0a4d3f36de58df9ef0b3992a3ffb359c2
Author: Lulu Cheng <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
Date:   Tue Mar 5 14:43:04 2024 +0800

    LoongArch: Fixed an issue with the implementation of the template atomic_compare_and_swapsi.
    
    If the hardware does not support LAMCAS, atomic_compare_and_swapsi needs to be
    implemented through "ll.w+sc.w". In the implementation of the instruction sequence,
    it is necessary to determine whether the two registers are equal.
    Since LoongArch's comparison instructions do not distinguish between 32-bit
    and 64-bit, the two operand registers that need to be compared are symbolically
    extended, and one of the operand registers is obtained from memory through the
    "ll.w" instruction, which can ensure that the symbolic expansion is carried out.
    However, the value of the other operand register is not guaranteed to be the
    value of the sign extension.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * config/loongarch/sync.md (atomic_cas_value_strong<mode>):
            In loongarch64, a sign extension operation is added when
            operands[2] is a register operand and the mode is SImode.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.target/loongarch/atomic-cas-int.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/loongarch/sync.md                       | 46 ++++++++++++++++------
 .../g++.target/loongarch/atomic-cas-int.C          | 32 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/sync.md b/gcc/config/loongarch/sync.md
index 8f35a5b48d2..d41c2d26811 100644
--- a/gcc/config/loongarch/sync.md
+++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/sync.md
@@ -245,18 +245,42 @@
    (clobber (match_scratch:GPR 5 "=&r"))]
   ""
 {
-  return "1:\\n\\t"
-	 "ll.<amo>\\t%0,%1\\n\\t"
-	 "bne\\t%0,%z2,2f\\n\\t"
-	 "or%i3\\t%5,$zero,%3\\n\\t"
-	 "sc.<amo>\\t%5,%1\\n\\t"
-	 "beqz\\t%5,1b\\n\\t"
-	 "b\\t3f\\n\\t"
-	 "2:\\n\\t"
-	 "%G4\\n\\t"
-	 "3:\\n\\t";
+  output_asm_insn ("1:", operands);
+  output_asm_insn ("ll.<amo>\t%0,%1", operands);
+
+  /* Like the test case atomic-cas-int.C, in loongarch64, O1 and higher, the
+     return value of the val_without_const_folding will not be truncated and
+     will be passed directly to the function compare_exchange_strong.
+     However, the instruction 'bne' does not distinguish between 32-bit and
+     64-bit operations.  so if the upper 32 bits of the register are not
+     extended by the 32nd bit symbol, then the comparison may not be valid
+     here.  This will affect the result of the operation.  */
+
+  if (TARGET_64BIT && REG_P (operands[2])
+      && GET_MODE (operands[2]) == SImode)
+    {
+      output_asm_insn ("addi.w\t%5,%2,0", operands);
+      output_asm_insn ("bne\t%0,%5,2f", operands);
+    }
+  else
+    output_asm_insn ("bne\t%0,%z2,2f", operands);
+
+  output_asm_insn ("or%i3\t%5,$zero,%3", operands);
+  output_asm_insn ("sc.<amo>\t%5,%1", operands);
+  output_asm_insn ("beqz\t%5,1b", operands);
+  output_asm_insn ("b\t3f", operands);
+  output_asm_insn ("2:", operands);
+  output_asm_insn ("%G4", operands);
+  output_asm_insn ("3:", operands);
+
+  return "";
 }
-  [(set (attr "length") (const_int 28))])
+  [(set (attr "length")
+     (if_then_else
+	(and (match_test "GET_MODE (operands[2]) == SImode")
+	     (match_test "REG_P (operands[2])"))
+	(const_int 32)
+	(const_int 28)))])
 
 (define_insn "atomic_cas_value_strong<mode>_amcas"
   [(set (match_operand:QHWD 0 "register_operand" "=&r")
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/loongarch/atomic-cas-int.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/loongarch/atomic-cas-int.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..830ce48267a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/loongarch/atomic-cas-int.C
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+#include <atomic>
+#include <cstdio>
+
+__attribute__ ((noinline)) long
+val_without_const_folding (long val)
+{
+  return val;
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  int oldval = 0xaa;
+  int newval = 0xbb;
+  std::atomic<int> amo;
+
+  amo.store (oldval);
+
+  long longval = val_without_const_folding (0xff80000000000000 + oldval);
+  oldval = static_cast<int> (longval);
+
+  amo.compare_exchange_strong (oldval, newval);
+
+  if (newval != amo.load (std::memory_order_relaxed))
+    __builtin_abort ();
+
+  return 0;
+}
+


More information about the Gcc-cvs mailing list