[gcc(refs/users/aoliva/heads/testme)] [docs] note that -g opts are implicitly negatable too
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Jan 20 18:50:12 GMT 2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43ad467068ca53d8c87680797dbd8283dd271d82
commit 43ad467068ca53d8c87680797dbd8283dd271d82
Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
Date: Fri Jan 20 15:41:37 2023 -0300
[docs] note that -g opts are implicitly negatable too
Back in 2017, I made -g* options implicitly negatable, without
realizing there was documentation that required updating. Oops.
Fixed, at last!
for gcc/ChangeLog
* doc/options.texi (option, RejectNegative): Mention that
-g-started options are also implicitly negatable.
Diff:
---
gcc/doc/options.texi | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/options.texi b/gcc/doc/options.texi
index c6e73fd1818..f50063c9787 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/options.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/options.texi
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ the help text to use for @option{--help} (omitted if the second field
contains the @code{Undocumented} property).
@end enumerate
-By default, all options beginning with ``f'', ``W'' or ``m'' are
+By default, all options beginning with ``f'', ``g'', ``W'' or ``m'' are
implicitly assumed to take a ``no-'' form. This form should not be
listed separately. If an option beginning with one of these letters
does not have a ``no-'' form, you can use the @code{RejectNegative}
@@ -239,8 +239,8 @@ and should not be accepted by the driver.
@item RejectNegative
The option does not have a ``no-'' form. All options beginning with
-``f'', ``W'' or ``m'' are assumed to have a ``no-'' form unless this
-property is used.
+``f'', ``g'', ``W'' or ``m'' are assumed to have a ``no-'' form unless
+this property is used.
@item Negative(@var{othername})
The option will turn off another option @var{othername}, which is
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list