This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/87048] [9 Regression] array_constructor_8.f90 failure on armeb
- From: "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:40:58 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/87048] [9 Regression] array_constructor_8.f90 failure on armeb
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-87048-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks like there was a misunderstanding, I was probably not clear.
r263082 actually removed the regression I reported, because that commit reverts
the offending one. So current trunk is OK.
I'm looking again at the traces, and the different function names noticed by
Thomas seem harmless (it seems to me that the different symbols refer to the
same functions, eg _uname is weak alias for uname, etc...)