This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/88297] [9 Regression] Assembler Error: symbol `_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii.constprop.0' is already defined
- From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 14:08:34 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/88297] [9 Regression] Assembler Error: symbol `_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii.constprop.0' is already defined
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-88297-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Originally we maintained things safe by having the global counter and not using
same suffixes (i.e. constprop/wpa etc.) during early, wpa and late
optimization, so things did not conflict.
I wonder how the conflict happens here. All the .constprop clones are produced
at WPA so we should have counter for those right? I need to take closer look at
the patch.
Honza