This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug lto/88297] [9 Regression] Assembler Error: symbol `_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii.constprop.0' is already defined


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297

--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Originally we maintained things safe by having the global counter and not using
same suffixes (i.e. constprop/wpa etc.) during early, wpa and late
optimization, so things did not conflict.

I wonder how the conflict happens here. All the .constprop clones are produced
at WPA so we should have counter for those right? I need to take closer look at
the patch.

Honza

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]