This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/85640] [8/9 Regression] Code size regression vs 7.3.1
- From: "amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:53:08 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/85640] [8/9 Regression] Code size regression vs 7.3.1
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-85640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(first paragraph of previous comment had 'before'/'after' swapped, sorry)
Also note that adjusting the testcase to use size_t rather than unsigned int
for the 'len' variable (as production code probably should) avoids the issue:
final value replacement doesn't need to special case len==0 then.