This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/16351] NULL dereference warnings
- From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 14:56:12 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c/16351] NULL dereference warnings
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-16351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #57 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #56)
> I'd say any warning option with more than just a handful of pr's against it
> would benefit from having a meta-bug.
On second thought I think actually a meta-bug for -Wnull-dereference should be
a new, separate bug. There's a large cc-list for this bug and making it a
meta-bug would result in everyone on it getting way more emails than they
signed up for. So, with a new, separate meta-bug for remaining issues with
-Wnull-dereference, would it be okay to close this one?