This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/85574] [9 Regression] LTO bootstapped binaries differ
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:32:45 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/85574] [9 Regression] LTO bootstapped binaries differ
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-85574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On April 30, 2018 5:01:30 PM GMT+02:00, "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org"
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
>
>Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
>
>--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>Attachement seems to be missing. How do I reproduce it?
You reproduce w/o attachment, just LTO bootstrap up to comparison stage and
then cmp cc1 or gengtype. Works fine on the branch, miscompares on trunk.
>The partitioning changes are not really affecting any sorting. The
>changes
>will be null with -flto-partitioning=<anything except for ballanced>