This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/83789] __builtin_altivec_lvx fails for powerpc for altivec-4.c
- From: "Kaushik.Phatak at kpit dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 04:27:47 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/83789] __builtin_altivec_lvx fails for powerpc for altivec-4.c
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-83789-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #21 from Kaushik.Phatak at kpit dot com ---
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your work on this.
>> Kaushik, remind me, you're seeing the same ICE in GCC 7 as well
Yes, this does fail in gcc-7.x.
>> so we need a backport of the patch committed to trunk?
If a backport to GCC 7 is feasible, then that would be very much appreciated.
I tried patching parts of the file as-is, but it fails while patching the hunk
to the file, rs6000-p8swap.c
This file (rs6000-p8swap.c) does not exist in gcc-7.x and was introduced in 8,
I believe.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Kaushik M. Phatak
-----Original Message-----
From: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 11:02 PM
To: Kaushik Phatak <Kaushik.Phatak@kpit.com>
Subject: [Bug target/83789] __builtin_altivec_lvx fails for powerpc for
altivec-4.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #20 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Kaushik,
remind me, you're seeing the same ICE in GCC 7 as well, so we need a backport
of the patch committed to trunk?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You reported the bug.