This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/84961] [7/8 Regression] ICE error: SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT is wrong


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84961

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 43716
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43716&action=edit
gcc8-pr84961.patch

So like this?  Or of course the gimplifier could do it too.
The second testcase passed e.g. with 4.4, but fails already with 4.6, the first
one regressed later with the SSA_NAME gimplification.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]