This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/77691] [7/8 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs
- From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:45:00 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/77691] [7/8 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-77691-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> So GCC's definition of max_align_t is not consistent with malloc in Solaris
Oh, I'm assuming here that the definition of max_align_t is coming from GCC's
<stddef.h>.
Wherever that max_align_t definitions comes from, it should match what malloc
does.