This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/84743] default widths for parallel reassociation now hurt rather than help


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84743

--- Comment #3 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes I'm digging into this now and omnetpp is at the top of the list. I can see
if there is a difference between cpu2006 and 2017 as well. For gcc7 I used 2006
to determine the widths.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]