This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug gcov-profile/84548] [8 regression] gcov ICE in process_file, at gcov.c:1154


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548

--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 43508
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43508&action=edit
Patch candidate

For reduced test-case:

$ cat test.cc
struct A { static int foo () { return 1; }; static int bar () {
  int x;
  return 2; } };

int main()
{
  return A::foo () + A::bar ();
}

I now have:

$ cat test.cc.gcov
        -:    0:Source:test.cc
        -:    0:Graph:test.gcno
        -:    0:Data:test.gcda
        -:    0:Runs:1
        -:    0:Programs:1
        2:    1:struct A { static int foo () { return 1; }; static int bar () {
        -:    2:  int x;
        1:    3:  return 2; } };
------------------
_ZN1A3fooEv:
        1:    1:struct A { static int foo () { return 1; }; static int bar () {
------------------
_ZN1A3barEv:
        1:    1:struct A { static int foo () { return 1; }; static int bar () {
        -:    2:  int x;
        1:    3:  return 2; } };
------------------
        -:    4:
        1:    5:int main()
        -:    6:{
        1:    7:  return A::foo () + A::bar ();
        -:    8:}

Which is correct in my opinion. Can you please Dmitry test the patch?

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]