This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/84243] New: [8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-4.c at r257414
- From: "jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 16:57:52 +0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/84243] New: [8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-4.c at r257414
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84243
Bug ID: 84243
Summary: [8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-4.c at
r257414
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86-64-none-linux-gnu, aarch64-none-linux-gnu
Hi, our bisect robot spotted a failure in gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-3.c,
gcc.target/i386/cet-intrin-4.c, after revision r257414 on
x86-64-none-linux-gnu, and c-c++-common/fcf-protection-6.c and
c-c++-common/fcf-protection-7.c on aarch64-none-linux.gnu. Would you mind
taking a look?
Your new tests will always FAIL on non-x86 targets (for example
aarch64-none-linux-gnu). Is dg-error really the right directive, that is a
guaranteed FAIL, I would expect a skip.