This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917
- From: "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 09:06:24 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-82518-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
My setup uses armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf (as opposed to armeb-eabi as you
report). I have never tried armeb-eabi.
I am also using qemu as simulator (in user mode, not in system mode).
The failure in initialise_monitor_handles indicates a problem in the startup
code, while initializing the semi-hosting interface.
Can you try qemu?