This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/83126] [8 Regression] ICE in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt, at tree-parloops.c:1713
- From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:50:29 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/83126] [8 Regression] ICE in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt, at tree-parloops.c:1713
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-83126-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83126
Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2017-12-19
CC| |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This test has a write to *fd where fd is uninitialized.
Also, the set to fd looks weird:
fd = *fd;
fd is an int *, and you're trying to set the pointer to the value of a short?
I've fixed the uninitialized problem, while leaving the short to int * move,
and I still get an ICE, so... confirmed:
void
ew (unsigned short int c9, int stuff)
{
int e1;
for (;;)
{
unsigned int *by = &e1;
int *fd = &stuff;
*fd = c9;
fd = *fd;
if (*fd != 0)
for (*by = 0; *by < 2; ++*by)
c9 *= e1;
}
}
We are failing the following assert in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt:
struct reduction_info *red = reduction_phi (reduction_list, phi);
gcc_assert (virtual_operand_p (res_a)
|| res_a == control
|| red != NULL);
(gdb) call debug_generic_stmt(res_a)
e1_27
(gdb) call debug_generic_stmt(control)
ivtmp_8
FWIW, the defining PHI statement for ivtmp_8 looks weird:
# ivtmp_8 = PHI <(17)>
As do other PHIs:
# c9_29 = PHI <(8), (15)>
# e1_30 = PHI <(8), (15)>