This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/83294] int32_t & related definitions wrong with -funsigned-bitfields
- From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 21:51:13 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c/83294] int32_t & related definitions wrong with -funsigned-bitfields
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-83294-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83294
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
FWIW, current glibc already uses signed int for int32_t (via using it for
__int32_t which is used to define int32_t), entirely as an accident
following a header refactoring, but not for other types such as
int_least32_t or int_fast32_t (so a glibc issue would still be appropriate
for those other types).