This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug sanitizer/82076] inconsistencies between sanitizer and -Wstringop-overflow


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82076

Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |law at redhat dot com

--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Yea, I think it's inevitable that sanitizer-instrumented code is likely to run
afoul of various warnings.  Using the sanitizers disables certain
optimizations.  Optimizations that often we rely on to get accurate warnings.

I think we should ultimately consider this NOTABUG.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]