This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/82692] [8 Regression] Ordered comparisons used for unordered built-ins


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82692

--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #15)
> My point is that doing this only for FLOAT_MODE_P makes no real sense.
> If we can describe ordered comparisons with special CC modes, we should
> do tests with those modes only here.

I really can't see how we can use CC_MODES_COMPATIBLE check without harming
integer compares. Not being an expert in this part of the compiler, I'm out of
ideas what to do here - do you perhaps have a particular solution in mind?

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]