This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug gcov-profile/82633] gcov does not handle removed functions


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82633

--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > I don't think so Richi: documentation says:
> > 
> > The execution count is ‘-’ for lines containing no code.
> 
> "code" or "source code"?

Good question :) Yes, now it reflects to GIMPLE statements.

> 
> Because what's the difference to
> 
>         -:   11:  MyClass2 a;
> 
> ?  I belive implementation-wise any source line that doesn't end up
> having a corresponding assembler stmt with that line will be emitted
> as '-', so DCEd stmts will be listed as '-', not '0'.  Does GCC _ever_
> print '0'?

No we never print 0. Actually the lines starting with ##### are the interesting
that are marked by tools as really not executed:

https://gcc.opensuse.org/gcc-lcov/gcc/collect2.c.gcov.html

and subject for another coverage. That's why I would like to see function
'iterate' being marked same as foo.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]