This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224

--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> > Or just remove or xfail the testcase.  The asan.c change is right even for
> > the branches...
> > 
> > BTW, just for completeness, I'm also seeing
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr69255-2.c (test for excess errors)
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr69255-3.c (test for excess errors)
> > regression on 6.x branch, in that case no idea what has caused it, just that
> > it appeared in between June 22nd and September 15th.
> 
> I'll mark them as XFAIL then.
> 
> The i386 test-case started to fail with mine r252795. I'll take a look.

We need there your revision r242740. May I backport it? Or just the hunk that
adjusts the test-case?

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]