This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)
- From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:00:19 +0000
- Subject: [Bug debug/81278] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-81278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #11)
> > Unfortunately the bisection was unsuccessful (no wonder
> > given that the failure is not 100% reproducible (GC related)).
>
> Well, I can help you with that. Any idea which value of ggc-min-heapsize to
> select in order to have it "more" bisection stable?
--param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0 would be best, but it
will of course take ages on the unreduced testcase.