This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/44943] Need documentation on the intended semantics of "volatile" (in C)
- From: "db0451 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:01:45 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c/44943] Need documentation on the intended semantics of "volatile" (in C)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-44943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44943
DB <db0451 at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |db0451 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from DB <db0451 at gmail dot com> ---
As far as I can tell, according to P0162R0:
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2017/p0612r0.html
which was adopted this month:
https://isocpp.org/blog/2017/03/2017-03-post-kona-mailing-available
the current behaviour of g++ is now Standard behaviour in C++ (if not C)
If so, then I guess the documentation needs updated:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Volatiles.html
(I don't know yet whether this is intended as a DR to be backported to older
standards.)