This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug debug/80453] another compare-debug failure


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80453

--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So the issue is that vn_phi_eq depends on cond_stmts_equal_p which may change
if we value-number the controlling condition after the PHI itself which can
trivially happen with SCC based value-numbering as controlling conditions are
not part of the SCC.

Index: gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c        (revision 246964)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c        (working copy)
@@ -2941,10 +2941,12 @@ cond_stmts_equal_p (gcond *cond1, gcond
   else
     return false;

+#if 0
   lhs1 = vn_valueize (lhs1);
   rhs1 = vn_valueize (rhs1);
   lhs2 = vn_valueize (lhs2);
   rhs2 = vn_valueize (rhs2);
+#endif
   return ((expressions_equal_p (lhs1, lhs2)
           && expressions_equal_p (rhs1, rhs2))
          || (commutative_tree_code (code1)

would fix this (and pessimize PHI VN of course).

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]