This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430

--- Comment #43 from Bijan Chokoufe <bijan at chokoufe dot com> ---
I actually made the same mistake when generating the diffs. I attach the
correct diff when --with-precision=extended is given to configure. Similar
contents though, as far as I can judge. Strangely, the code without volatile is
overall larger:

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1456592 Apr 18 14:43 shower_core.s
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1450362 Apr 18 14:20 shower_core_volatile.s

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]