[Bug target/80013] New: [ms_abi-windows x86-64] A Pointer Size 64-bit Wide or 32-bit Wide?

["rudyy.id at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80013

            Bug ID: 80013
           Summary: [ms_abi-windows x86-64] A Pointer Size 64-bit Wide or
                    32-bit Wide?
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rudyy.id at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

This is a log from a c source I'm compile using -O2 (The weird stuff start on
line 790 and so on):

 614                            .p2align 3,,7
 615                            .def    _arc4random_buf.part.2; .scl    3;     
.type   32;     .endef
 616                            .seh_proc       _arc4random_buf.part.2
 617                    _arc4random_buf.part.2:
 618 0888 4157                  push    r15
 619                            .seh_pushreg    r15
 620 088a 4156                  push    r14
 621                            .seh_pushreg    r14
 622 088c 4155                  push    r13
 623                            .seh_pushreg    r13
 624 088e 4154                  push    r12
 625                            .seh_pushreg    r12
 626 0890 55                    push    rbp
 627                            .seh_pushreg    rbp
 628 0891 57                    push    rdi
 629                            .seh_pushreg    rdi
 630 0892 56                    push    rsi
 631                            .seh_pushreg    rsi
 632 0893 53                    push    rbx
 633                            .seh_pushreg    rbx
 634 0894 4883EC38              sub     rsp, 56
 635                            .seh_stackalloc 56
 636                            .seh_endprologue
 637 0898 488B0500              mov     rax, QWORD PTR Arc4Rand_Mutex[rip]
 637      000000
 638 089f 4989CE                mov     r14, rcx
 639 08a2 4889D5                mov     rbp, rdx
 640 08a5 4885C0                test    rax, rax
 641 08a8 0F84BF01              je      .L94

.......................................................

/* CreateMutexA(void* pMutexSecurity, int bOwner, char* pName) */
/* CreateMutexW(void* pMutexSecurity, int bOwner, wchar_t* pName) */

/* InterlockedCompareExchangePointer, basically this is just cmpxchg with a
lock */

 789                    .L94:
 790 0a6d 31C9                  xor     ecx, ecx /* Since the 1st argument is a
pointer type, Isn't this suppose to be rcx? */
 791 0a6f 4531C0                xor     r8d, r8d /* Since the 3rd argument is a
pointer type, Isn't this suppose to be r8? */
 792 0a72 31D2                  xor     edx, edx /* This is correct, since the
2nd argument is a BOOL (32-bit wide) */
GAS LISTING D:\Documents\GCC-MinGW\_Temp\ccwQlMZr.s                    page 20


 793 0a74 FF150000              call    [QWORD PTR __imp_CreateMutexW[rip]]
 793      0000
 794 0a7a 4889C1                mov     rcx, rax
 795 0a7d 4885C0                test    rax, rax
 796 0a80 743D                  je      .L105
 797                    .L47:
 798 0a82 31C0                  xor     eax, eax /* Isn't this suppose to be
rax? */
 799 0a84 F0480FB1              lock cmpxchg    QWORD PTR Arc4Rand_Mutex[rip],
rcx
 799      0D000000 
 799      00
 800 0a8d 4885C0                test    rax, rax /* Hey its rax, but the
comparand is eax? */
 801 0a90 0F8418FE              je      .L46


Using GNUC 6.3.0 + Binutils 2.28 + mingw64 header and libs 2017. Build by
msys2.
Using GNUC 7.x + Binutils 2.28 + mingw64 header and libs 2017. Build by someone
from x265 developer.
Both compiler show the same result but 7.x had better optimization than 6.x :)
Both compiler also show the same result if I'm using ATT silent option (no log
output except error stuff).

Disassembler ms dll and take a look inside for CreateMutexW:
    test         edx,edx /* 2nd argument from the caller */
    mov          rax,r8 /* 3rd argument is r8 from the caller but gnuc using
r8d? */
    jnz         .
    xor          r8d,r8d / 3rd Argument for CreateMutexExW ; its int/DWORD */
    mov          r9d,0001F0001 /* Access Method ; 4rd argument for
CreateMutexExW ; its int/DWORD */
    mov          rdx,rax /* 2nd Argument for CreateMutexExW , taken from 3rd
argument of the caller */
    jmp          CreateMutexExW
    nop
    nop