This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/79992] accessing storage member of lambda via pointer with -no-pie causes the next function to overwrite the pointer's data


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79992

--- Comment #12 from Yanai <yanai.eli11 at gmail dot com> ---
It took me 5 minutes to guess that it polluted my home folder, but thanks
anyway.
More semi-on-topic: I have another potential bug (aside 4 others), the bug
is that the compiler says there's no ::type in enable_if, when I use two
enable_ifs in constructor's parameters. Does it sound like a front-end bug?

When I use one enable_if like: enable_if<first_enable_if_condition &&
second_condition>::type it works. (instead of
enable_if<first_condition>,enable_if<second_condition>)

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]