This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/79382] DTIO ICE


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382

--- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> ---
Hi Walt,

My reading of the situation is that since, in this version, the
generic procedure is typebound in a public derived type, the PUBLIC
attribute is already accorded it..... I think!

Do you have access to a recent copy of ifort? Mine is on my
workstation, which is still in storage after a house move. I would be
curious to know how it responds to both the typebound and the explicit
generic interface versions.

Best regards

Paul

On 6 February 2017 at 17:50, walt.brainerd at gmail dot com
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
>
> --- Comment #4 from Walt Brainerd <walt.brainerd at gmail dot com> ---
> Sorry, I forgot to remove the extraneous USE statement
> which cutting down from the original code.
>
> I am not good with this new stuff; please explain what
> the syntax error is? If the PUBLIC statement is not correct,
> how do you make the write(formatted) interface public?
>
> Thanks for looking at this so quickly.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]