[Bug c++/79308] ICE on specialization of nested template classes (in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2963)

["marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79308

Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code         |ice-on-valid-code

--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to bjhend from comment #3)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > Confirmed, all releases I have ICE (4.5.0+).
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> thanks for confirmation. You also added the keyword ice-on-INvalid-code, but
> I think the code is valid.
> 
> The C++-11 standard, paragraph 14.7.3, clause 5 contains a similar example
> (see nested template struct C) with a single element function. Additionally,
> I cannot find anything in the text, saying that this code is invalid, but I
> might be wrong in interpreting the standard.

Sorry for such keyword, I'm not familiar with the standard. Let's switch that
to valid and see what maintainers think about it.