This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/79318] New: conversion member function preceded with & is not marked as error
- From: "gcc at mailinator dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 07:04:47 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/79318] New: conversion member function preceded with & is not marked as error
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79318
Bug ID: 79318
Summary: conversion member function preceded with & is not
marked as error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gcc at mailinator dot com
Target Milestone: ---
See example and discussion on
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41954449/what-does-gccs-conversion-function-operator-int-do
Conversion member function declaration like
&operator int ();
does not produce a warning or error and is interpreted as
operator int& ();
by GCC. It fails on e.g. CLANG.
Usage of & in front of operator seems not to be covered by the language
definition.
Verified up to gcc 6.3.