This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/78468] [7 regression] libgomp.c/reduction-10.c and many more FAIL


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468

--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #28)
> > Well, at least at this point in GCC 7 development the fewer architectures we
> > change the better.
> 
> Sure, but by changing the middle-end, you change all the architectures at
> once and may break a fair number of them in the process.  At this point I'd
> lean towards Bernd's position and revert again the get_dynamic_stack_size
> change, since it relies on the very questionable settings of init_emit.

I have no problem with that for GCC 7 either.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]