This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/78848] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure
- From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:00:49 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/78848] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-78848-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #10)
> If you were asking if the non-typebound form using interface instead is
> valid form, yes it is.
I was wondering mainly what the non-typebound form is supposed do at runtime,
as opposed to the typebound form, but I guess I have figured that out by now.
r243784 should implement what is specified in the F03 standard in section
9.5.3.7.3 ("Resolving derived-type input/output procedure references"). I think
this issue can be closed.