This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/71913] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing copy elision with operator new
- From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 18:01:28 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/71913] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing copy elision with operator new
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-71913-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Pádraig Brady from comment #15)
> So it would be good to set the "Target Milestone" to 5.5
But it was also fixed for 4.9.4, so that's what the target milestone says.
You can't reliably use that query for "bugs fixed in 5.5" because it doesn't
find bugs fixed in (for example) both 4.9.4 and 5.5
And if we set the milestone to 5.5 you would just have the same problem trying
to find bugs fixed in 4.9.4