This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/78255] [5/6/7 regression] Indirect sibling call causing wrong code generation for ARM
- From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:46:42 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/78255] [5/6/7 regression] Indirect sibling call causing wrong code generation for ARM
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-78255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm, why is this even being considered on ARM?
arm.h:#define NO_FUNCTION_CSE 1
doc/tm.texi
@defmac NO_FUNCTION_CSE
Define this macro to be true if it is as good or better to call a constant
function address than to call an address kept in a register.
@end defmac