This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/78546] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546

--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
> 
> Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> > Testing
> > 
> > diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
> > index 2d4e019..9e5df64 100644
> > --- a/gcc/match.pd
> > +++ b/gcc/match.pd
> > @@ -1216,6 +1216,13 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> >       (if (cst && !TREE_OVERFLOW (cst))
> >        (minus { cst; } @0)))))
> >  
> > +  /* CST - (CST - A) -> CST - A  */
> 
> Shouldn't this be just -> -A?

The constants need not be the same.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]