This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/41861] [DR 887][C++0x] <condition_variable> does not use monotonic_clock
- From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:20:50 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/41861] [DR 887][C++0x] <condition_variable> does not use monotonic_clock
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-41861-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41861
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Roman Fietze from comment #12)
> Sorry if it is inappropriate to ask for any changes, but how can it be, that
> there is no fix for this bug for years in any of the GCC releases?
Because it's not possible to implement the C++ requirements purely in terms of
POSIX, so it requires a new API in the C library, which is complicated. All the
information you need to investigate that is provided in this bug report and the
enclosed links.
> With this bug condition_variable::wait_until is completely unusable on many
I find that hard to believe.