This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)
- From: "ranjan.winner at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 15:05:18 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-72787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787
--- Comment #5 from martin <ranjan.winner at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to rguenther@suse.de from comment #4)
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, ranjan.winner at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from martin <ranjan.winner at gmail dot com> ---
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > > You can't rely on __builtin_object_size this way, please look up its
> > > documentation.
> >
> > Hi Richard,
> > Sorry, can you kindly throw some more pointers over this.
> > Here is the link for gcc document on object-size-Checking:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Object-Size-Checking.html
> >
> >
> > Also some pointer over my Query:-
> >
> > Why for gcc-4.6 changes with tree-ssa.c file are omitted but not in gcc-4.7
> > branch
>
> Because the change is intrusive and not strictly required.
Thanks:)