This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*)


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796

--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #12)
> For a pointer to member function that's still problematic because the
> exception object for 'throw nullptr' is currently one word, and a pointer to
> member function is two.  So I suppose we will need to allocate two words for
> 'throw nullptr'.  But clang doesn't do that; do they actually handle
> catching nullptr as a pointer to member function?

But then again, testing whether a PMF is null only checks the first word on
non-ARM targets, so we can probably get away with still only allocating the one
word and setting it to NULL.  ARM will probably need to allocate two words.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]