This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/71114] [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090
- From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 13:41:37 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/71114] [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-71114-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #14)
> > Looks I found the problem. validize_mem generates new instructions which
> > are placed wrongly. This patch should help. Unfortunately I can't test
> > it properly on Darwin.
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I just started a clean regstrap, allow for ~6h+.
that code won't build - did you mean :
if (!standard_sse_constant_p (vec_cst, V2DImode))
- vec_cst = validize_mem (force_const_mem (V2DImode, vec_cst));
+ {
+ start_sequence ();
+ vec_cst = validize_mem (force_const_mem (V2DImode, vec_cst));
+ rtx_insn *seq = get_insns ();
+ end_sequence ();
+ emit_insn_before (seq, insn);
+ }
?