This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:58:58 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-67239-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The empty class passing ABI changes were reverted and are going to be resolved
only for GCC7+.
I've tried your testcase (and latest preprocessed hash_policy.ii from i686
build) with -g -O2 {,-finline-small-functions} {,-fpic} -mx32, and certainly
don't see any .cfi_escape directives in there. So, what is the real bug then?
>From gcc-testresults, it seems it only fails with -mx32 -fpic, and not with
plain -mx32, but that is all I can find out.