This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/70594] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594

--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For the #c0 difference with the #c20 instrumentation there is:
/tmp/uids:"yynewstate" label_decl 101636 0 3
/tmp/uids:"yyabortlab" label_decl 101638 0 3
/tmp/uids:"yyacceptlab" label_decl 101639 0 3
/tmp/uids:"yyacceptlab" label_decl 139896 0 2
/tmp/uids:"yyabortlab" label_decl 139897 0 2
/tmp/uids:"yynewstate" label_decl 139898 0 2
/tmp/uids_:"yynewstate" label_decl 101633 0 3
/tmp/uids_:"yyabortlab" label_decl 101635 0 3
/tmp/uids_:"yyacceptlab" label_decl 101636 0 3
/tmp/uids_:"yynewstate" label_decl 139354 0 2
/tmp/uids_:"yyacceptlab" label_decl 139357 0 2
/tmp/uids_:"yyabortlab" label_decl 139358 0 2
which means that it is all about LABEL_DECLs, which are first created using
build_decl in the same order, just with tiny differences in DECL_UID, but then
the are copy_node copied in different order.  So guess the question is why they
are copied in the different order.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]